<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11019/35">
    <title>T-Stor Collection: Outputs from research funded by Teagasc</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11019/35</link>
    <description>Outputs from research funded by Teagasc</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11019/765" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10197/2520" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10197/2422" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/57425" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2017-11-06T10:10:52Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11019/765">
    <title>Irish Famine Facts</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11019/765</link>
    <description>Title: Irish Famine Facts
Authors: Keating, John
Abstract: The Irish Famine of 1845-1850 caused over one million deaths and forced a further one million people to flee the country. In this book, the author sets out to provide a synopsis of the documented facts and scientific background to the famine. The poverty, the hardship of subsistence living and the role of the potato in pre-famine Irleand are described. So also is the coming of blight and the response of the Government and voluntary bodies to the famine. The consequences of the disaster for the people are dealt with in detail. The book is fully illustrated and presents in a concise format the story of one of the greatest human tragedies of the nineteenth century.
Description: Book, 88 pages."This publication had its origins in a major exhibition organized by Teagasc (The Agriculture and Food Development Authority) and the Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry"--Title page verso.</description>
    <dc:date>1996-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10197/2520">
    <title>The significance of the differences in soil phosphorus representation and transport procedures in the SWAT and HSPF models and a comparison of their performance in estimating phosphorus loss from an agriculture catchment in Ireland</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10197/2520</link>
    <description>Title: The significance of the differences in soil phosphorus representation and transport procedures in the SWAT and HSPF models and a comparison of their performance in estimating phosphorus loss from an agriculture catchment in Ireland
Authors: Nasr, Ahmed Elssidig; Bruen, Michael; Moles, Richard; Byrne, Paul; O'Regan, Bernadette
Abstract: Phosphorus transported from agriculture land has been identified as a major source of water pollution in a large number of Irish catchments. Models of this process are required in order to design and assess management measures. This paper reports on the comparison and assessment of two of the most promising physically-based distributed models, SWAT and HSPF, with particular emphasis on their suitability for Irish conditions. The representation of the overall soil phosphorus cycle is similar in both models but there is a significant difference in the level of detail in describing the chemical and biochemical processes in each model. Also there are differences in modeling the mechanisms by which phosphorus is removed from the soil column and either transported in dissolved form with the runoff water or in particulate form attached to eroded or detached sediment. These differences could have a significant influence on performance when using either of the models to simulate phosphorus loss from any catchment. Both models are applied to estimating the phosphorus concentration at the outlet of the Clarianna catchment in north Tiperrary (Ireland). This catchment is small (23km2) and the landuse is mainly pasture on grey brown podozilic soils. The results of model calibration are presented along with an assessment of the usefulness of the model outputs as a water quality management tool.
Description: Phosphorus transported from agriculture land has been identified as a major source of water pollution in a large number of Irish catchments. Models of this process are required in order to design and assess management measures. This paper reports on the comparison and assessment of two of the most promising physically-based distributed models, SWAT and HSPF, with particular emphasis on their suitability for Irish conditions. The representation of the overall soil phosphorus cycle is similar in both models but there is a significant difference in the level of detail in describing the chemical and biochemical processes in each model. Also there are differences in modeling the mechanisms by which phosphorus is removed from the soil column and either transported in dissolved form with the runoff water or in particulate form attached to eroded or detached sediment. These differences could have a significant influence on performance when using either of the models to simulate phosphorus loss from any catchment. Both models are applied to estimating the phosphorus concentration at the outlet of the Clarianna catchment in north Tiperrary (Ireland). This catchment is small (23km2) and the landuse is mainly pasture on grey brown podozilic soils. The results of model calibration are presented along with an assessment of the usefulness of the model outputs as a water quality management tool.</description>
    <dc:date>2012-07-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10197/2422">
    <title>Multi-criteria and Decision Support Systems in support of the Water Framework Directive in Ireland</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10197/2422</link>
    <description>Title: Multi-criteria and Decision Support Systems in support of the Water Framework Directive in Ireland
Authors: Bruen, Michael; Nasr, Ahmed Elssidig
Abstract: The current challenge in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in Ireland is to introduce programmes of measures that will address the targeted environmental objectives in each River Basin District (RBD). Introduction of such programmes requires that proposed measures be thoroughly evaluated and that decisions will involve multiple criteria and must include stakeholders preferences and opinions. Decision Support Systems (DSS) facilitate this process. Many such systems have been developed and used in relation to water quality. In addition to their technical, modeling, benefits, DSS can also form the basis of systems to communicate options, benefits and damages to stakeholders and to receive feedback on their attitudes and preferences. Such systems could also be involved in facilitating the subsequent negotiations and resulting compromises. In Ireland, a new research project, Wincoms, has commenced which will address these aspects and will provide recommendations for suitable systems to be used in Ireland.
Description: The current challenge in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in Ireland is to introduce programmes of measures that will address the targeted environmental objectives in each River Basin District (RBD). Introduction of such programmes requires that proposed measures be thoroughly evaluated and that decisions will involve multiple criteria and must include stakeholders preferences and opinions. Decision Support Systems (DSS) facilitate this process. Many such systems have been developed and used in relation to water quality. In addition to their technical, modeling, benefits, DSS can also form the basis of systems to communicate options, benefits and damages to stakeholders and to receive feedback on their attitudes and preferences. Such systems could also be involved in facilitating the subsequent negotiations and resulting compromises. In Ireland, a new research project, Wincoms, has commenced which will address these aspects and will provide recommendations for suitable systems to be used in Ireland.</description>
    <dc:date>2012-07-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2262/57425">
    <title>Organic dairy farming: impacts on insect flower interaction networks and pollination</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2262/57425</link>
    <description>Title: Organic dairy farming: impacts on insect flower interaction networks and pollination
Authors: Stout, Jane Catherine; Power, Eileen
Abstract: 1. Pollination interactions comprise a network of connections between ﬂowers and insect visitors.
They are crucial for reproductive success in many angiosperms but are threatened by intensive agricultural practices. Although less intensive approaches, including organic farming, could improve
farmland biodiversity, it is not clear whether or not these approaches enhance wild plant pollination
and the stability of insect–ﬂower interaction networks.
2. We investigated the eﬀects of organic vs. conventional farming on insect–ﬂower interaction network size and structure, bee and hoverﬂy diversity, and pollination in 10 pairs of organic and conventional dairy farms in the Republic of Ireland.
3. We found that insect–ﬂower interaction networks on organic farms were larger and more asymmetrically structured than networks on conventional farms. Overall, however, networks contained
fewer taxa and niche overlap and plant ⁄ animal ratios were relatively low compared with previously
documented insect–ﬂower interaction networks. Organic farms did attract higher numbers of bees
partly because of higher ﬂoral abundances (mainly Trifolium sp.). Hoverﬂy evenness was greater in
organic farms but neither abundance, richness nor evenness was related to ﬂoral abundance, suggesting organic farms provide additional resources for hoverﬂies. Pollination of Crataegus monogyna hawthorn was higher on organic farms, although pollen deposition was limited.
4. Synthesis and applications. Organic dairy farming can increase the size and alter the structure of
insect–ﬂower interaction networks. However, network stability was not improved and all networks
(organic and conventional) were vulnerable because of their small size, low niche overlap and low
plant ⁄ animal ratios. Nonetheless, organic farming provided more ﬂowers that attracted more
ﬂower visitors and improved pollination of C. monogyna. We suggest that strategic management of
important ﬂowers for pollinators in hedgerows and pastures should be endorsed in agri-environmental schemes. Sowing Trifolium spp., and allowing these plants to ﬂower, could beneﬁt bees, but
more research into hoverﬂy ecology is necessary before realistic conservation recommendations can
be made for this group. We conclude that organic farming, although not the solution in its present
form, can beneﬁt insect biodiversity, insect–ﬂower interaction networks and insect-mediated pollination.
Description: 1. Pollination interactions comprise a network of connections between ﬂowers and insect visitors.&#xD;
They are crucial for reproductive success in many angiosperms but are threatened by intensive agricultural practices. Although less intensive approaches, including organic farming, could improve&#xD;
farmland biodiversity, it is not clear whether or not these approaches enhance wild plant pollination&#xD;
and the stability of insect–ﬂower interaction networks.&#xD;
2. We investigated the eﬀects of organic vs. conventional farming on insect–ﬂower interaction network size and structure, bee and hoverﬂy diversity, and pollination in 10 pairs of organic and conventional dairy farms in the Republic of Ireland.&#xD;
3. We found that insect–ﬂower interaction networks on organic farms were larger and more asymmetrically structured than networks on conventional farms. Overall, however, networks contained&#xD;
fewer taxa and niche overlap and plant ⁄ animal ratios were relatively low compared with previously&#xD;
documented insect–ﬂower interaction networks. Organic farms did attract higher numbers of bees&#xD;
partly because of higher ﬂoral abundances (mainly Trifolium sp.). Hoverﬂy evenness was greater in&#xD;
organic farms but neither abundance, richness nor evenness was related to ﬂoral abundance, suggesting organic farms provide additional resources for hoverﬂies. Pollination of Crataegus monogyna hawthorn was higher on organic farms, although pollen deposition was limited.&#xD;
4. Synthesis and applications. Organic dairy farming can increase the size and alter the structure of&#xD;
insect–ﬂower interaction networks. However, network stability was not improved and all networks&#xD;
(organic and conventional) were vulnerable because of their small size, low niche overlap and low&#xD;
plant ⁄ animal ratios. Nonetheless, organic farming provided more ﬂowers that attracted more&#xD;
ﬂower visitors and improved pollination of C. monogyna. We suggest that strategic management of&#xD;
important ﬂowers for pollinators in hedgerows and pastures should be endorsed in agri-environmental schemes. Sowing Trifolium spp., and allowing these plants to ﬂower, could beneﬁt bees, but&#xD;
more research into hoverﬂy ecology is necessary before realistic conservation recommendations can&#xD;
be made for this group. We conclude that organic farming, although not the solution in its present&#xD;
form, can beneﬁt insect biodiversity, insect–ﬂower interaction networks and insect-mediated pollination.</description>
    <dc:date>2012-07-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

