T-Stor
 

T-Stor >
Crops, Environment & Land Use Programme >
Environment, Soils & Land Use >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11019/1156

Title: Gross nitrogen transformations in grassland soil react differently to urea stabilisers under laboratory and field conditions
Authors: Harty, M.A.
McGeough, K.L.
Carolan, R.
Muller, C.
Laughlin, R.J.
Lanigan, Gary
Richards, Karl G.
Watson, C.J.
Keywords: Gross N transformations
DCD
NBPT
Combined inhibitor
Laboratory and field study
Issue Date: 10-Feb-2017
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: M.A. Harty, K.L. McGeough, R. Carolan, C. Müller, R.J. Laughlin, G.J. Lanigan, K.G. Richards, C.J. Watson, Gross nitrogen transformations in grassland soil react differently to urea stabilisers under laboratory and field conditions, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2017, 109, 23-34, doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.01.025
Series/Report no.: Soil Biology and Biochemistry;vol 109
Abstract: A laboratory and a field study were conducted on a permanent grassland soil in Northern Ireland to investigate the effects of urea in combination with N process inhibitors such as the urease inhibitor N-(butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) and/or the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) on soil N dynamics. Urea enriched with n-butyl 15N to 60 atom % was applied to soil at a rate of 100 μg N g−1 dry soil in the laboratory and 100 kg N ha−1 in the field. A numerical 15N tracing model was used to quantify several simultaneously occurring gross N transformation rates in both studies. The changes in soil nitrate (NO3−) and ammonium (NH4+) concentrations and 15N enrichment over a 25-day period as well as the concentration and 15N enrichment of plant N at harvest were used to model soil gross N transformations. The results showed that the effect of N process inhibitors varied firstly between laboratory and field studies and secondly whether the inhibitors were applied individually or in combination. Overall DCD had a greater effect on the major soil N transformations than NBPT; reducing oxidation of NH4+, total nitrification, net NO3− produced, total mineralisation and the net adsorption of NH4+ at both laboratory and field scale. The effect of DCD was similar for these transformations whether applied alone or co-applied with NBPT. In contrast NBPT had no significant effect on oxidation of NH4+, total nitrification, total mineralisation or total immobilisation compared to urea in the field, while the effect on these transformations in the laboratory was significant. The contrasting effects of inhibitors on gross N transformations between laboratory and field may relate to the differences in experimental conditions, e.g. soil preparation, environmental conditions and the contribution of plant biomass. To obtain a more realistic assessment of gross soil N transformations in situ, it is essential that laboratory experiments are supplemented with field studies.
Description: peer-reviewed
This research was financially supported under the National Development Plan, through the Research Stimulus Fund, administered by the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (Grant numbers RSF10-/RD/SC/716 and RSF11S138) and from the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs for Northern Ireland. The first author gratefully acknowledges funding received from the Teagasc Walsh Fellowship Scheme.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11019/1156
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.01.025
ISSN: 0038-0717
Appears in Collections:Environment, Soils & Land Use

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Harty et al post print.pdf914.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright


View Statistics

Items in T-Stor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! Teagasc - The Agriculture and Food Development Authority  2012  - Feedback