T-Stor
 

T-Stor >
Other Teagasc Research >
Teagasc publications in Biomed Central >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11019/281

Title: Veterinary dairy herd fertility service provision in seasonal and non-seasonal dairy industries - a comparison
Authors: Mee, John F
Keywords: Herd fertility services
Bovine fertility
Herd management
Issue Date: 1-Apr-2010
Publisher: Biomed Central
Citation: Irish Veterinary Journal. 2010 Apr 01;63(4):230-235
Series/Report no.: Irish Veterinary Journal.
Abstract: The decline in dairy herd fertility internationally has highlighted the limited impact of traditional veterinary approaches to bovine fertility management. Three questionnaire surveys were conducted at buiatrics conferences attended by veterinary practitioners on veterinary dairy herd fertility services (HFS) in countries with a seasonal (Ireland, 47 respondents) and non-seasonal breeding model (The Netherlands, 44 respondents and Portugal, 31 respondents). Of the 122 respondents, 73 (60%) provided a HFS and 49 (40%) did not. The majority (76%) of all practitioners who responded stated that bovine fertility had declined in their practice clients' herds with inadequate cow management, inadequate nutrition and increased milk yield as the most important putative causes. The type of clients who adopted a herd fertility service were deemed more educated than average (70% of respondents), and/or had fertility problems (58%) and/or large herds (53%). The main components of this service were routine postpartum examinations (95% of respondents), fertility records analysis (75%) and ultrasound pregnancy examinations (69%). The number of planned visits per annum varied between an average of four in Ireland, where breeding is seasonal, and 23 in Portugal, where breeding is year-round. The benefits to both the practitioner and their clients from running a HFS were cited as better fertility, financial rewards and job satisfaction. For practitioners who did not run a HFS the main reasons given were no client demand (55%) and lack of fertility records (33%). Better economic evidence to convince clients of the cost-benefit of such a service was seen as a major constraint to adoption of this service by 67% of practitioners.
Description: peer-reviewed
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11019/281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-0481-63-4-230
Appears in Collections:Animal & Bioscience
Teagasc publications in Biomed Central

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
2046-0481-63-4-230.pdf138.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright


View Statistics

Items in T-Stor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! Teagasc - The Agriculture and Food Development Authority  2012  - Feedback