T-Stor
 

T-Stor >
Crops, Environment & Land Use Programme >
Environment, Soils & Land Use >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11019/343

Title: Evaluation of Amendments to Control Phosphorus Losses in Runoff from Dairy-Soiled Water
Authors: Fenton, Owen
Serrenho, Ana
Healy, Mark G.
Keywords: Dairy soiled water
Iron (II) chloride tetrahydride
Lime
Alum
Bottom ash
Issue Date: Nov-2011
Publisher: Springer
Citation: Fenton, O., Serrenho, A., Healy, M.G. Evaluation of amendments to control phosphorus losses in runoff from dairy soiled water. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 2011, 222 (1-4), 185-194. DOI: 10.1007/s11270-011-0815-8
Series/Report no.: Water, Air & Soil Pollution;vol 222
Abstract: Amendments with the potential to reduce phosphorus (P) losses from agricultural grassland arising from the land application of dairy-soiled water (DSW) were investigated. Optimal application rates were studied, and associated costs and feasibility were estimated. First, batch tests were carried out to identify appropriate chemicals or phosphorus sorbing materials to control P in runoff from DSW. Then, the best four treatments were examined in an agitator test. In this test, soil—placed in a beaker—was loaded with DSW or amended DSW at a rate equivalent to 5 mm ha−1 (the maximum permissible application rate of DSW allowable in a 42-day period in Ireland). The soil was overlain with continuously stirred water to simulate runoff on land-applied DSW. Optimum application rates were selected based on percentage removal of dissolved reactive phosphorus in overlying water and the estimated cost of amendment. The costs of the amendments, per cubic metre of DSW, increased in the order: bottom ash (1.55 €), alum (1.67 to 1.92 €), FeCl2·4H2O (3.55 to 8.15 €), and lime (20.31 to 88.65 €). The feasibility of the amendments, taking into account their cost, potential adverse effects, public perception, and their performance, decreased in the order: alum > FeCl2·4H2O > bottom ash > lime. Amendments to DSW could be introduced in critical source areas—areas where high soil test P and direct migration pathways to a receptor overlap.
Description: peer-reviewed
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11019/343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11270-011-0815-8
http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11270-011-0815-8?LI=true#
ISSN: 0049-6979
Appears in Collections:Environment, Soils & Land Use

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
_ARAN_ Fenton_etal_WaterAirSoilPollution w cover.pdf254.9 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright


View Statistics

Items in T-Stor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! Teagasc - The Agriculture and Food Development Authority  2012  - Feedback