T-Stor >
Crops, Environment & Land Use Programme >
Environment, Soils & Land Use >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11019/344

Title: Effect of chemical amendments to dairy soiled water and time between application and rainfall on phosphorus and sediment losses in runoff
Authors: Serrenho, A.
Fenton, Owen
Murphy, P. N. C.
Grant, Jim
Healy, Mark G.
Keywords: Dairy soiled water
Farm effluent
Application timing
Incidental loss
Chemical amendment
Issue Date: 15-Jul-2012
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: A. Serrenho, O. Fenton, P.N.C. Murphy, J. Grant, M.G. Healy, Effect of chemical amendments to dairy soiled water and time between application and rainfall on phosphorus and sediment losses in runoff. Science of The Total Environment, 2012, 430, 1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.04.061
Series/Report no.: Science of the Total Environment;vol 430
Abstract: Dairy soiled water (DSW) is a dilute, low nutrient effluent produced on Irish dairy farms through the regular washing down of milking parlours and holding areas. In Ireland, there is no closed period for the land application of DSW except where heavy rain is forecast within 48 h. Chemical amendments have the potential to decrease phosphorus (P) and suspended sediment (SS) loss from DSW applied to land. This study examined the impact of three time intervals (12, 24 and 48 h) between DSW application and rainfall and five treatments (control, unamended DSW, and DSW amended with lime, alum or ferric chloride (FeCl2)) on P and sediment losses from an intact grassland soil in runoff boxes. Rainfall was simulated at 10.5 ± 1 mm h− 1. Phosphorus concentrations (1–1.6 mg L− 1) in runoff from DSW application, while not quantitative measures of P loss to surface waters in the field, indicated the importance of incidental P losses and that the current 48 h restriction in Ireland is prudent. Unamended DSW application increased P loss by, on average, 71%, largely due to an increase in particulate phosphorus (PP) loss. All three amendments were effective in decreasing P and SS losses in runoff and, apart from the SS results for lime, were significantly different (p < 0.05) to the control at at least one time point. Lime (a 64% reduction in total phosphorus (TP) in comparison with DSW only) was less effective than alum or FeCl2, likely due to the lower solubility of CaCO3 in water. Chemical amendment showed potential to decrease P losses from land application of DSW, but the efficacy of such amendments would need to be assessed in field trials and a cost–benefit analysis conducted to further examine whether they could be practically implemented on farms.
Description: peer-reviewed
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11019/344
ISSN: 0048-9697
Appears in Collections:Environment, Soils & Land Use

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Serrenho et al_TSTOR version.pdf245.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

View Statistics

Items in T-Stor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


Valid XHTML 1.0! Teagasc - The Agriculture and Food Development Authority  2012  - Feedback