T-Stor >
Crops, Environment & Land Use Programme >
Environment, Soils & Land Use >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11019/413

Title: Evaluation of headspace equilibration methods for quantifying greenhouse gases in groundwater
Authors: Jahangir, Mohammad M. R.
Johnston, P.
Khalil, M.I.
Grant, Jim
Somers, Cathal
Richards, Karl G.
Keywords: Greenhouse gas
Headspace extraction
Dissolved gases
Shaking time
Standing time
Issue Date: 23-Aug-2012
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Jahangir, M. M. R.; Johnston, P.; Khalil, M. I.; Grant, J.; Somers, C.; Richards, K. G. Evaluation of headspace equilibration methods for quantifying greenhouse gases in groundwater. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012, 111, 208-212. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.033
Series/Report no.: Journal of Environmental Management;vol 111
Abstract: The objective of the study was to evaluate the different headspace equilibration methods for the quantification of dissolved greenhouse gases in groundwater. Groundwater samples were collected from wells with contrasting hydrogeochemical properties and degassed using the headspace equilibration method. One hundred samples from each well were randomly selected, treatments were applied and headspace gases analysed by gas chromatography. Headspace equilibration treatments varied helium (He):water ratio, shaking time and standing time. Mean groundwater N2O, CO2 and CH4 concentrations were 0.024 mg N L−1, 13.71 mg C L−1 and 1.63 μg C L−1, respectively. All treatments were found to significantly influence dissolved gas concentrations. Considerable differences in the optimal He:water ratio and standing time were observed between the three gases. For N2O, CO2 and CH4 the optimum operating points for He:water ratio was 4.4:1, 3:1 and 3.4:1; shaking time was 13, 12 and 13 min; and standing time was 63, 17 and 108 min, respectively. The headspace equilibration method needs to be harmonised to ensure comparability between studies. The experiment reveals that He:water ratio 3:1 and shaking time 13 min give better estimation of dissolved gases than any lower or higher ratios and shaking times. The standing time 63, 17 and 108 min should be applied for N2O, CO2 and CH4, respectively.
Description: peer-reviewed
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11019/413
ISSN: 0301-4797
Appears in Collections:Environment, Soils & Land Use

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Jahangir et al postprint_JEMA.pdf134.93 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

View Statistics

Items in T-Stor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


Valid XHTML 1.0! Teagasc - The Agriculture and Food Development Authority  2012  - Feedback