Animal & Grassland Research & Innovation Programme >
Animal & Bioscience >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||A survey of biosecurity-related practices, opinions and communications across dairy farm veterinarians and advisors|
|Authors: ||Sayers, Riona|
|Issue Date: ||25-Feb-2014|
|Citation: ||R.G. Sayers, M. Good, G.P. Sayers. A survey of biosecurity-related practices, opinions and communications across dairy farm veterinarians and advisors. The Veterinary Journal, Vol. 200(2), May 2014, pp 261-269. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.02.010|
|Series/Report no.: ||The Veterinary Journal;vol 200|
|Abstract: ||Biosecurity at farm-level can often be poorly implemented, and lack of information has been cited by many studies as a potential explanation. Veterinary practitioners (VPs) and dairy advisors (DAs) play a central role in the provision of animal health and management services to dairy farmers. The objective of this study was to document and compare biosecurity-related practices and opinions across VPs and DAs in Ireland. A selection of veterinary experts (VEs) from outside of Ireland was also surveyed.
Questionnaires were completed and response rates of 47% (VPs), 97% (DAs), and 65% (VEs) were achieved. Significant differences were identified in the promotion and implementation of biosecurity between VPs and DAs, with a higher proportion of VPs regularly receiving requests from (P = 0.004), and dispensing advice to (P < 0.0001), their farm clients. Communication between DAs and VPs was sub-optimal with over 60% of each group not in regular communication with each other. With regard to the main farmer motivation for biosecurity implementation, the majority of VPs (62%) prioritised external factors such as ‘economic benefit’ and ‘mandatory obligation’, while the majority of DAs prioritised health/animal-related factors (69%), which were similar to those of farmers (83.1%), although they remained significantly less likely (OR = 1.8) than farmers to choose such motivators (P = 0.005). Inconsistencies in the implementation of, and in opinions relating to, farm biosecurity were highlighted across all the groups surveyed emphasising the need for standardised information and improved communication.|
|Appears in Collections:||Animal & Bioscience|
Items in T-Stor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.