T-Stor
 

T-Stor >
Animal & Grassland Research & Innovation Programme >
Animal & Bioscience >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11019/586

Title: A survey of biosecurity-related practices, opinions and communications across dairy farm veterinarians and advisors
Authors: Sayers, Riona
Good, M.
Sayers, Gearoid
Keywords: Biosecurity
Veterinarian
Advisor
Dairy Farmer
Communication
Ranking
Issue Date: 25-Feb-2014
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: R.G. Sayers, M. Good, G.P. Sayers. A survey of biosecurity-related practices, opinions and communications across dairy farm veterinarians and advisors. The Veterinary Journal, Vol. 200(2), May 2014, pp 261-269. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.02.010
Series/Report no.: The Veterinary Journal;vol 200
Abstract: Biosecurity at farm-level can often be poorly implemented, and lack of information has been cited by many studies as a potential explanation. Veterinary practitioners (VPs) and dairy advisors (DAs) play a central role in the provision of animal health and management services to dairy farmers. The objective of this study was to document and compare biosecurity-related practices and opinions across VPs and DAs in Ireland. A selection of veterinary experts (VEs) from outside of Ireland was also surveyed. Questionnaires were completed and response rates of 47% (VPs), 97% (DAs), and 65% (VEs) were achieved. Significant differences were identified in the promotion and implementation of biosecurity between VPs and DAs, with a higher proportion of VPs regularly receiving requests from (P = 0.004), and dispensing advice to (P < 0.0001), their farm clients. Communication between DAs and VPs was sub-optimal with over 60% of each group not in regular communication with each other. With regard to the main farmer motivation for biosecurity implementation, the majority of VPs (62%) prioritised external factors such as ‘economic benefit’ and ‘mandatory obligation’, while the majority of DAs prioritised health/animal-related factors (69%), which were similar to those of farmers (83.1%), although they remained significantly less likely (OR = 1.8) than farmers to choose such motivators (P = 0.005). Inconsistencies in the implementation of, and in opinions relating to, farm biosecurity were highlighted across all the groups surveyed emphasising the need for standardised information and improved communication.
Description: peer-reviewed
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11019/586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.02.010
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090023314000641
ISSN: 1090-0233
Appears in Collections:Animal & Bioscience

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Biosecurity Veterinarians and Advisors postprint.pdf845.24 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright


View Statistics

Items in T-Stor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! Teagasc - The Agriculture and Food Development Authority  2012  - Feedback