Loading...
Blockage reduction to increase the efficiency of slurry application.
Ryan, Declan ; Brett, P.
Ryan, Declan
Brett, P.
Citations
Altmetric:
Date
1999-12-01
Collections
Files
Loading...
eopr-4309.pdf
Adobe PDF, 121.19 KB
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Citation
Ryan, D., Brett, P., Blockage reduction to increase the efficiency of slurry application, End of Project Reports, Teagasc, 1999.
Abstract
Discussions with farmers using band and injection slurry spreaders suggested that
the rate of breakdown due to blockages, in these machines, was approximately one
per day. This report shows how the use of an intake filter and a modified
distributor on a band spreader can reduce this problem.
A set of obstacles was assembled on the basis of information from farmers and
from literature. Ten classes of obstacles were selected, at random, and between
size limits.
Two prototype filters, a commercial filter and an open pipe were tested while
drawing slurry from an open tank to a tanker. During each test, obstacles were
thrown into the slurry stream. Obstacles retained by the filter were counted
afterwards. A second filter trial was organised to test the tendency of filters to
clog. Obstacle tests with 3 prototype distributors and a control were conducted in
a similar manner to the first filter trial but, in this case, preliminary tests were
conducted in water and final tests in slurry. The initial tests identified the best
prototype. This was then compared to the control distributor using slurry.
The open pipe allowed 80% of obstacles to pass while the filters allowed only 4 –
19% through. The new filters offered no improvement over the commercial unit.
Filters required 16 hours agitation but the open pipe required 4 hours or less.
The best prototype had the same diameter as the control but had an obstacle trap
attached at the side. In a test using obstacles and slurry, the control was
obstructed by 56% of the obstacles while the prototype allowed only 21% to cause
a blockage. Flow through the prototype was initially too large. Slowing down the
rotor in the distributor and restricting the outlet from the obstacle trap with a
single long pipe, connected to two nozzles, controlled the flow.
The results of the filter and distributor trials were combined. Of the seventy
obstacles dropped above the filter, six passed through. Four of these caused
blockages in the control distributor, but only one became stuck in the prototype.
The blockage rate in the distributor and nozzles was significantly reduced
compared to the original unit.
