Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEarley, Bernadette*
dc.contributor.authorMcNamara, John*
dc.contributor.authorJerrams, Stephen J*
dc.contributor.authorO'Riordan, Edward G.*
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-15T15:47:39Z
dc.date.available2017-06-15T15:47:39Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-30
dc.identifier.citationEarley, B., McNamara, J.D., Jerrams, S.J., O'Riordan, E.G. Effect of concrete slats, three mat types and out-wintering pads on performance and welfare of finishing beef steers. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 2017, May 30;59(1):34. DOI: 10.1186/s13028-017-0302-3en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11019/1134
dc.descriptionpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.description.abstractBackground The objective was to investigate the effect of placing mats on concrete slatted floors on performance, behaviour, hoof condition, dirt scores, physiological and immunological variables of beef steers, and to compare responses with animals on out-wintering pads. Continental crossbred beef steers [n = 360; mean (±SD) initial live weight 539 kg (42.2)] were blocked by breed and live weight and randomly assigned to one of five treatments; (1) Concrete slats alone, (2) Mat 1 (Natural Rubber structure) (Durapak Rubber Products), (3) Mat 2 (Natural rubber structure) (EasyFix), (4) Mat 3 (modified ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) foam structure) and (5) Out-wintering pads (OWP’s). Results Animals on the OWPs had a greater (P < 0.05) live weight gain (P < 0.05) compared with the slat and Mat 2 treatments: results for Mat 1 and Mat 3 were the same (P > 0.05) as the other treatments. Animals on the OWPs had reduced lying percentage time compared with all the other treatments. Dry matter (DM) intake was greater for animals on the OWPs compared with all the other treatments. Carcass weight, kill out proportion, carcass fat score, carcass composition score, FCR and physiological responses were similar (P > 0.05) among treatments. No incidence of laminitis was observed among treatments. The number of hoof lesions was greater on all mat types (P < 0.05) compared with concrete slats and OWP treatments. Dirt scores were greater (P < 0.05) for animals on OWPs when measured on days 42, 84, 105, 126 and 150 compared with animals on slats. Conclusions Under the conditions adopted for the present study, there was no evidence to suggest that animals housed on bare concrete slats were disadvantaged in respect of animal welfare compared with animals housed on other floor types. It is concluded that the welfare of steers was not adversely affected by slats compared with different mat types or OWPs.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Veterinaria Scandinavica;vol 59
dc.subjectHousingen_GB
dc.subjectAnimal welfareen_GB
dc.subjectConcrete slaten_GB
dc.subjectRubber maten_GB
dc.titleEffect of concrete slats, three mat types and out-wintering pads on performance and welfare of finishing beef steersen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.updated2017-06-04T03:41:06Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.identifier.rmisGEAB-0204-6675
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-017-0302-3
refterms.dateFOA2018-01-12T09:00:19Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
13028_2017_Article_302.pdf
Size:
3.213Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record