Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGustavsson, Madeleine*
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-17T11:05:28Z
dc.date.available2018-07-17T11:05:28Z
dc.date.issued26/03/2018
dc.identifier.citationMadeleine Gustavsson, Examining the ‘cultural sustainability’ of two different ways of governing fishing practices, Marine Policy, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.03.017en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11019/1566
dc.descriptionpeer-revieweden_US
dc.description.abstractResearch has suggested there is a need for an increased attention to the socio-cultural lifeworlds of fishers and fisheries and its importance for fisheries management. An emerging response to this call has been to examine the social and cultural contexts of ‘good fishing’ – an idea which, drawing on the work of Pierre Bourdieu, has sought to move the discussion beyond simply the economic aspects of fishing to also understand the importance of other forms of capital. Utilising these concepts together with the conceptual idea of ‘knowledge cultures’, the following paper examines the ‘cultural sustainability’ of different ways of governing fishing practices – in particular Marine Conservation Zones and voluntary lobster v-notching using a case study approach to the small-scale fishery of Llŷn peninsula, North Wales (UK). The paper observes that those approaches that allow fishers to demonstrate skills and recognises the temporal contingency of fishing lives can be considered more culturally sustainable than others. This paper also notes that culturally acceptable changes to fishing practices can be supported by fishing regulations and, the paper suggests, such innovations are more likely to be taken up by fishers in their everyday fishing practices. The paper recommends that policies seeking to alter fishing practices consider: i) the importance fishers’ hold in demonstrating their skills; ii) how social relations are as important as economic aspects to fishers’ long-term uptake of new practices; and iii) how the past and the future (such as if a successor is present) holds significance for fishers’ actions in the present.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMarine Policy;
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectFishing practicesen_US
dc.subjectFisheries managementen_US
dc.subjectSocio-cultural contexten_US
dc.subjectgood fisheren_US
dc.subjectKnowledge culturesen_US
dc.subjectSymbolic capitalen_US
dc.subjectcultural sustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectMarine Conservation Zonesen_US
dc.subjectlobster v-notching’en_US
dc.titleExamining the ‘cultural sustainability’ of two different ways of governing fishing practicesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.embargo.terms28/09/2018en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.03.017
dc.contributor.sponsorSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpoolen_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-07-17T11:05:29Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Gustavsson_preprint wdoi.pdf
Size:
336.4Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Accepted Author Manuscript

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States