Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSmith, Shaun
dc.contributor.authorMeade, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorGibbons, James
dc.contributor.authorMcGill, Kevina
dc.contributor.authorBolton, Declan
dc.contributor.authorWhyte, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-17T11:01:27Z
dc.date.available2020-06-17T11:01:27Z
dc.date.issued2016-11-11
dc.identifier.citationSmith, S., Meade, J., Gibbons, J., McGill, K., Bolton, D. and Whyte, P. Impact of direct and indirect heating systems in broiler units on environmental conditions and flock performance. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 15(11), 2588-2595. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61380-1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11019/2003
dc.descriptionpeer-revieweden_US
dc.description.abstractThis study compared the impact of three indirect heating systems to direct gas flame heaters on a selection of flock performance and environmental indicators in commercial broiler units. No statistically significant differences (P≥0.05) were found in flock mortality rates, bird weight, water consumption, stress response, carbon dioxide, ammonia, temperature, relative humidity, litter quality, within-flock Campylobacter levels or mean Campylobacter counts when flock data from any of the three indirect heating systems were compared to flocks reared in houses with direct heating systems. Differences in litter quality were observed between upper and lower litter layers in all houses, regardless of heating type, which may have implications for bird health and welfare. Carbon dioxide concentrations in houses with direct heating systems were significantly higher than those in houses with indirect heating systems during the first 10 days of bird life (P≤0.05). This was due to the increased use of heating systems during this period of the flock cycle. Differences in CO2 concentrations had no effect on flock performance, possibly due to the fact that concentrations did not exceed known safe levels. A statistically significant increase in stress response was observed in birds as a result of partial depopulation (thinning) within houses, irrespective of heating system type used (P≤0.05). Stress associated with thinning may have consequences for bird welfare and food safety. In conclusion, the results of our study suggest that indirect heating systems do not appear to negatively impact on flock performance, stress response, within-flock Campylobacter levels or mean Campylobacter counts and do not appear to significantly alter environmental conditions within broiler houses when compared to houses equipped with direct heating systems. Indirect systems are a viable alternative for heating broiler houses in terms of flock performance, bird welfare and food safety.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Integrative Agriculture;Vol. 15 (11)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectlitter qualityen_US
dc.subjectwelfareen_US
dc.subjectstressen_US
dc.subjectpoultry productionen_US
dc.subjectcampylobacteren_US
dc.subjectenvironmental conditionsen_US
dc.titleImpact of direct and indirect heating systems in broiler units on environmental conditions and flock performanceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.embargo.terms2018-11-11en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61380-1
dc.contributor.sponsorDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Marineen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumber11SF328en_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-11-11T00:00:00Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Impact-of-direct-and-indirect- ...
Size:
828.6Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
main article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States