Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFitzpatrick, Sarah R
dc.contributor.authorGarvey, Mary
dc.contributor.authorFlynn, Jim
dc.contributor.authorJordan, Kieran
dc.contributor.authorGleeson, David E
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-07T12:02:11Z
dc.date.available2020-07-07T12:02:11Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-25
dc.identifier.citationFitzpatrick, S.R., Garvey, M., Flynn, J. et al. Are some teat disinfectant formulations more effective against specific bacteria isolated on teat skin than others?. Acta Vet Scand 61, 21 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-019-0455-3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11019/2160
dc.descriptionpeer-revieweden_US
dc.description.abstractThe use of pre- and post-milking teat disinfectants can reduce teat bacterial load and aid in the collection of high-quality milk. The objective of this study was to compare the reduction in bacteria populations on teat skin after the application of different commercial teat disinfectant products. Ten teat disinfectant products were applied to the teats of 10 Holstein–Friesian cows. One cow received one teat disinfectant product at each sampling point before cluster application for milking. A composite swab sample was taken of the 4 teats of each cow before and after teat disinfectant application. Swab samples were placed on three different selective agars to enumerate bacterial counts of staphylococcal, streptococcal and coliforms isolates on teat skin. Staphylococcal isolates were the most prominent bacterial group recovered on teat swabs (49%), followed by streptococcal (36%) and coliform (15%) isolates before the application of disinfectant. The average bacterial reductions on teat skin were shown to be 76%, 73% and 60% for staphylococcal, streptococcal and coliform isolates, respectively. All of the teat disinfectant products tested reduced teat bacterial load for all three bacterial groups. Product 4 containing 0.6% w/w diamine was the most effective against bacterial populations of staphylococcal and streptococcal isolates on teat skin with a reduction of 90% and 94%, respectively. Whereas product 10, which contained 0.5% w/w iodine, resulted in the highest reduction in coliforms on teat skin with a reduction of 91%. Results from this study suggest that specific bacterial population loads on teats can be reduced using different teat disinfectant formulations.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBiomed Centralen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Veterinaria Scandinavica;
dc.subjectDairy cowsen_US
dc.subjectDairy hygieneen_US
dc.subjectSwabsen_US
dc.subjectTeat bacterial loaden_US
dc.subjectTeat disinfectionen_US
dc.titleAre some teat disinfectant formulations more effective against specific bacteria isolated on teat skin than others?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.updated2019-04-28T03:36:06Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-019-0455-3
dc.contributor.sponsorDairy Research Irelanden_US
dc.contributor.sponsorTeagasc Walsh Fellowship Programmeen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumber2016054en_US
refterms.dateFOA2020-07-07T12:02:11Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
13028_2019_Article_455.pdf
Size:
753.9Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record