Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorvan Staaveren, Nienke
dc.contributor.authorDoyle, Bernadette
dc.contributor.authorHanlon, Alison
dc.contributor.authorBoyle, Laura
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-31T10:34:38Z
dc.date.available2020-07-31T10:34:38Z
dc.date.issued2019-02-19
dc.identifier.citationvan Staaveren, N.; Doyle, B.; Hanlon, A.; Boyle, L.A. Multi-Stakeholder Focus Groups on Potential for Meat Inspection Data to Inform Management of Pig Health and Welfare on Farm. Agriculture 2019, 9, 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9020040en_US
dc.identifier.issn2077-0472
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11019/2209
dc.descriptionpeer-revieweden_US
dc.description.abstractMeat inspection (MI) findings can act as a valuable source of information on pig health and welfare. The PIG WELFare INDicators (PIGWELFIND) project (Research Stimulus Fund 11/S/107) was developed to progress the development of ante and post mortem MI as a pig health and welfare diagnostic tool in Ireland. Three multi-stakeholder focus groups were organized to explore areas of conflict and agreement between stakeholders’ vision for including pig health and welfare indicators in MI and on how to achieve this vision. Each focus group consisted of eight stakeholders: pig producers, Teagasc pig advisors, pig processors, veterinarians involved in MI, private veterinary practitioners, and personnel with backgrounds in general animal health and welfare and food safety policy. In general, stakeholders expressed positive attitudes towards the use of MI data to inform pig health and welfare when standardization of recording and feedback is improved, and the MI system provides real-time benchmarking possibilities. Most emphasis was placed on health indicators as a first priority, while it was felt that welfare-related indicators could be included after practical barriers had been addressed (i.e., line speed/feasibility, standardization and training of meat inspectors, data ownership). Recommendations are made to further progress the development of MI as a pig health and welfare diagnostic tool and address some of these barriers.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAgriculture;9
dc.rightsAttribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectperspectivesen_US
dc.subjectmeat inspectionen_US
dc.subjectswineen_US
dc.subjectveterinariansen_US
dc.subjectpig producersen_US
dc.subjectprocessorsen_US
dc.subjectsocial scienceen_US
dc.subjecthealthen_US
dc.subjectmanagementen_US
dc.titleMulti-Stakeholder Focus Groups on Potential for Meat Inspection Data to Inform Management of Pig Health and Welfare on Farmen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9020040
dc.contributor.sponsorDepartment of Agriculture, Food and the Marineen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorTeagasc Walsh Fellowship Programmeen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumber11/S/107en_US
dc.source.volume9
dc.source.issue2
dc.source.beginpage40
refterms.dateFOA2020-07-31T10:34:39Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
agriculture-09-00040.pdf
Size:
251.8Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
main article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States