Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorvan der Voet, Hilko
dc.contributor.authorGoedhart, Paul W.
dc.contributor.authorLazebnik, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorKessel, Geert J. T.
dc.contributor.authorMullins, Ewen
dc.contributor.authorvan Loon, Joop J. A.
dc.contributor.authorArpaia, Salvatore
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-31T11:06:27Z
dc.date.available2020-07-31T11:06:27Z
dc.date.issued2019-02-14
dc.identifier.citationvan der Voet, H, Goedhart, PW, Lazebnik, J, et al. Equivalence analysis to support environmental safety assessment: Using nontarget organism count data from field trials with cisgenically modified potato. Ecol Evol. 2019; 9: 2863– 2882. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4964en_US
dc.identifier.issn2045-7758
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11019/2214
dc.descriptionpeer-revieweden_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper considers the statistical analysis of entomological count data from field experiments with genetically modified (GM) plants. Such trials are carried out to assess environmental safety. Potential effects on nontarget organisms (NTOs), as indicators of biodiversity, are investigated. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) gives broad guidance on the environmental risk assessment (ERA) of GM plants. Field experiments must contain suitable comparator crops as a benchmark for the assessment of designated endpoints. In this paper, a detailed protocol is proposed to perform data analysis for the purpose of assessing environmental safety. The protocol includes the specification of a list of endpoints and their hierarchical relations, the specification of intended levels of data analysis, and the specification of provisional limits of concern to decide on the need for further investigation. The protocol emphasizes a graphical representation of estimates and confidence intervals for the ratio of mean abundances for the GM plant and its comparator crop. Interpretation relies mainly on equivalence testing in which confidence intervals are compared with the limits of concern. The proposed methodology is illustrated with entomological count data resulting from multiyear, multilocation field trials. A cisgenically modified potato line (with enhanced resistance to late blight disease) was compared to the original conventional potato variety in the Netherlands and Ireland in two successive years (2013, 2014). It is shown that the protocol encompasses alternative schemes for safety assessment resulting from different research questions and/or expert choices. Graphical displays of equivalence testing at several hierarchical levels and their interpretation are presented for one of these schemes. The proposed approaches should be of help in the ERA of GM or other novel plants.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEcology and Evolution;9
dc.rightsAttribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectEnvironmental risk assessmenten_US
dc.subjectequivalence testen_US
dc.subject, hierarchical analysisen_US
dc.subjectlimit of concernen_US
dc.subjectmulticriteria decision analysisen_US
dc.subjectoverdispersed Poissonen_US
dc.titleEquivalence analysis to support environmental safety assessment: Using nontarget organism count data from field trials with cisgenically modified potatoen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4964
dc.contributor.sponsorEuropean Unionen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumber289706en_US
dc.source.volume9
dc.source.issue5
dc.source.beginpage2863-2882
refterms.dateFOA2020-07-31T11:06:28Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
ece3.pdf
Size:
2.649Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
main article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States