Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBerghuijs, Herman N. C.
dc.contributor.authorYin, Xinyou
dc.contributor.authorHo, Q. Tri
dc.contributor.authorRetta, Moges A.
dc.contributor.authorNicolaï, Bart M.
dc.contributor.authorStruik, Paul C.
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-13T11:41:18Z
dc.date.available2020-10-13T11:41:18Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-11
dc.identifier.citationBerghuijs, H.N.C., Yin, X., Ho, Q.T., Retta, M.A., Nicolaï, B.M. and Struik, P.C. (2019), Using a reaction‐diffusion model to estimate day respiration and reassimilation of (photo)respired CO2 in leaves. New Phytol, 223: 619-631. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15857en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11019/2337
dc.descriptionpeer-revieweden_US
dc.description.abstractMethods using gas exchange measurements to estimate respiration in the light (day respiration Rd) make implicit assumptions about reassimilation of (photo)respired CO2; however, this reassimilation depends on the positions of mitochondria. We used a reaction-diffusion model without making these assumptions to analyse datasets on gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and anatomy for tomato leaves. We investigated how Rd values obtained by the Kok and the Yin methods are affected by these assumptions and how those by the Laisk method are affected by the positions of mitochondria. The Kok method always underestimated Rd. Estimates of Rd by the Yin method and by the reaction-diffusion model agreed only for nonphotorespiratory conditions. Both the Yin and Kok methods ignore reassimilation of (photo)respired CO2, and thus underestimated Rd for photorespiratory conditions, but this was less so in the Yin than in the Kok method. Estimates by the Laisk method were affected by assumed positions of mitochondria. It did not work if mitochondria were in the cytosol between the plasmamembrane and the chloroplast envelope. However, mitochondria were found to be most likely between the tonoplast and chloroplasts. Our reaction-diffusion model effectively estimates Rd, enlightens the dependence of Rd estimates on reassimilation and clarifies (dis)advantages of existing methods.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipKU Leuven
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNew Phytologist;223
dc.rightsAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectC3 photosynthesisen_US
dc.subjectmesophyll conductanceen_US
dc.subjectphotorespirationen_US
dc.subjectreactiondiffusion modelen_US
dc.subjectreassimilationen_US
dc.subjectrespirationen_US
dc.titleUsing a reaction‐diffusion model to estimate day respiration and reassimilation of (photo)respiredCO2in leavesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15857
dc.contributor.sponsorthe BioSolar Cells programmeen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorResearch Council of the KU Leuvenen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumberproject C16/ 16/002en_US
dc.source.volume223
dc.source.issue2
dc.source.beginpage619
dc.source.endpage631
refterms.dateFOA2020-10-13T11:41:22Z
dc.source.journaltitleNew Phytologist


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Berghuijs_et_al-2019-New_Phyto ...
Size:
2.054Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
main article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International