Monitoring of Farm-Level Antimicrobial Use to Guide Stewardship: Overview of Existing Systems and Analysis of Key Components and Processes
Author
Sanders, PimVanderhaeghen, Wannes
Fertner, Mette
Fuchs, Klemens
Obritzhauser, Walter
Agunos, Agnes
Carson, Carolee
Borck Høg, Birgitte
Dalhoff Andersen, Vibe
Chauvin, Claire
Hémonic, Anne
Käsbohrer, Annemarie
Merle, Roswitha
L. Alborali, Giovanni
Scali, Federico
Stärk, Katharina D. C.
Muentener, Cedric
van Geijlswijk, Ingeborg
Broadfoot, Fraser
Pokludová, Lucie
Firth, Claire L.
Carmo, Luís P.
Garcia Manzanilla, Edgar

Jensen, Laura
Sjölund, Marie
Ferreira, Jorge Pinto
Brown, Stacey
Heederik, Dick
Dewulf, Jeroen
Keyword
antimicrobial uselivestock
overview
indicator
benchmarking
monitoring
antimicrobial stewardship
antimicrobial resistance
Date
2020
Metadata
Show full item recordStatistics
Display Item StatisticsCitation
Sanders P., Vanderhaeghen W., Fertner M., Fuchs K., Obritzhauser W., Agunos A., Carson C., Borck Høg B., Dalhoff Andersen V., Chauvin C., Hémonic A., Käsbohrer A., Merle R., Alborali G. L., Scali F., Stärk K. D. C., Muentener C., van Geijlswijk I., Broadfoot F., Pokludová L., Firth C. L., Carmo L. P., Manzanilla E. G., Jensen L., Sjölund M., Pinto Ferreira J., Brown S., Heederik D., Dewulf J. Monitoring of Farm-Level Antimicrobial Use to Guide Stewardship: Overview of Existing Systems and Analysis of Key Components and Processes. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 7. 2020. 540. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00540Abstract
The acknowledgment of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) as a major health challenge in humans, animals and plants, has led to increased efforts to reduce antimicrobial use (AMU). To better understand factors influencing AMR and implement and evaluate stewardship measures for reducing AMU, it is important to have sufficiently detailed information on the quantity of AMU, preferably at the level of the user (farmer, veterinarian) and/or prescriber or provider (veterinarian, feed mill). Recently, several countries have established or are developing systems for monitoring AMU in animals. The aim of this publication is to provide an overview of known systems for monitoring AMU at farm-level, with a descriptive analysis of their key components and processes. As of March 2020, 38 active farm-level AMU monitoring systems from 16 countries were identified. These systems differ in many ways, including which data are collected, the type of analyses conducted and their respective output. At the same time, they share key components (data collection, analysis, benchmarking, and reporting), resulting in similar challenges to be faced with similar decisions to be made. Suggestions are provided with respect to the different components and important aspects of various data types and methods are discussed. This overview should provide support for establishing or working with such a system and could lead to a better implementation of stewardship actions and a more uniform communication about and understanding of AMU data at farm-level. Harmonization of methods and processes could lead to an improved comparability of outcomes and less confusion when interpreting results across systems. However, it is important to note that the development of systems also depends on specific local needs, resources and aims.Funder
Joint Programming Initiative on Antimicrobial Resistance; Danish Pig Levy Fundae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00540
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International