A review of the pesticide MCPA in the land‐water environment and emerging research needs
Name:
Morton_et_al-2020-Wiley_Interd ...
Size:
2.433Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
main article
Author
Morton, Phoebe A.Fennell, Chris
Cassidy, Rachel
Doody, Donnacha
Fenton, Owen
Mellander, Per‐Erik
Jordan, Phil
Date
2019-12-03
Metadata
Show full item recordStatistics
Display Item StatisticsCitation
Morton, PA, Fennell, C, Cassidy, R, et al. A review of the pesticide MCPA in the land‐water environment and emerging research needs. WIREs Water. 2020; 7:e1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1402Abstract
Due to its high solubility and poor adsorption to the soil matrix, the postemergence herbicide 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA) is susceptible to transport into surface and groundwater bodies, where it can result in compromised water quality and breaches of legislative standards. However, there is still poor understanding of catchment scale dynamics and transport, particularly across heterogeneous hydrogeological settings. While it is known that MCPA degrades under aerobic conditions, negligible breakdown can occur in anaerobic environments, potentially creating a legacy in saturated soils. Fast runoff pathways post application are likely transport routes, but the relative contribution from the mobilization of legacy MCPA from anaerobic zones has yet to be quantified, making the delineation of MCPA sources encountered during monitoring programs challenging. While ecotoxicological effects have been examined, little is known about the interaction of MCPA (and its degradation products) with other pesticides, with nutrients or with colloids, and how this combines with environmental conditions to contribute to multiple stressor effects. We examine the state of MCPA knowledge, using case study examples from Ireland, and consider the implications of its widespread detection in waterbodies and drinking water supplies. Research themes required to ensure the sustainable and safe use of MCPA in an evolving agricultural, social and political landscape are identified here. These include the need to identify mitigation measures and/or alternative treatments, to gain insights into the conditions governing mobilization and attenuation, to map pathways of migration and to identify direct, synergistic and antagonistic ecotoxicological effects.Funder
European UnionGrant Number
727450; IVA5018ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1402
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States