Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRuelle, E.
dc.contributor.authorShalloo, L.
dc.contributor.authorButler, S.T.
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-23T14:50:40Z
dc.date.available2021-11-23T14:50:40Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationRuelle E, Shalloo L, Butler ST. Economic impact of different strategies to use sex-sorted sperm for reproductive management in seasonal-calving, pasture-based dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 2021;104(11):11747-11758; doi https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-20150en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11019/2649
dc.descriptionpeer revieweden_US
dc.description.abstractTo maximize efficiency, profitability, and societal acceptance of modern dairy production, it is important to minimize the production of male dairy calves with poor beef merit. One solution involves using sex-sorted sperm (SS) to generate dairy replacements and breeding all other cows to an easy-calving, short-gestation bull with good beef merit. We used the Pasture Based Herd Dynamic Milk Model to investigate the effect of herd fertility and use of SS on farm net profit in a herd of 100 cows. This was completed by simulating herds with differing fertility performance (good, average, poor), and differing farm reproductive management [conventional semen (CONV) or SS with varying pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI) relative to CONV (i.e., relative P/AI 100%, 85%, and 70%)]. As an additional consideration, the method of allocating SS to cows was also examined. The first option used SS on random heifers and cows (S). The second option used SS on heifers and targeted high-fertility cows (SSel). The final option was similar to SSel, but used a fixed-time artificial insemination (AI) protocol to facilitate AI on the farm mating start date (SSync). For CONV, dairy breed semen was used for AI until 50 animals were pregnant (50% chance of a female calf), whereas for S, SSel, or SSync the target number of animals successfully conceiving with SS was set at 28 (based on assumed 90% chance of a female calf from pregnancies derived from SS). Beef breed semen was used on all other dams. The results indicated that the biggest effect on farm net profit was not based on whether or not SS was used, but instead was most affected by the overall fertility performance of the herd. Total farm profit decreased by 10% between the good and average fertility herds, and decreased by a further 12% between the average and poor fertility herds. In almost all situations, when the relative P/AI with SS was 85%, use of SS led to an overall increase of the farm net profit. There was an economic benefit of using either SSel or SSync compared with S for the average and poor fertility herds but not for the good fertility herd, highlighting an interaction between SS P/AI and overall herd fertility as well as management practices. If the relative P/AI with SS was <70%, the use of SS led to a decrease in profitability in all simulations except for SSync, highlighting the importance of a good management strategy for use of SS. The findings in this study indicated that SS has significant potential to help facilitate greater integration between the dairy and beef production sectors, as well as increase farm profitability when used appropriately.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Dairy Science;Vol. 104
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectsex-sorted spermen_US
dc.subjectfertilityen_US
dc.subjectsynchronizationen_US
dc.subjecteconomic impacten_US
dc.subjectmodelingen_US
dc.titleEconomic impact of different strategies to use sex-sorted sperm for reproductive management in seasonal-calving, pasture-based dairy herdsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-20150
dc.contributor.sponsorDepartment of Agriculture, Food and the Marineen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorScience Foundation Irelanden_US
dc.contributor.sponsorIrish Dairy Levyen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumber15/5/696en_US
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumber16/RC/3835en_US
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-23T14:50:40Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Economic-impact-of-different-s ...
Size:
441.7Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
PDF of Main Article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International