• Login
    View Item 
    •   T-Stór
    • Other
    • Teagasc publications in Biomed Central
    • View Item
    •   T-Stór
    • Other
    • Teagasc publications in Biomed Central
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of T-StórCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsFunderThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsFunderProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Information

    Deposit AgreementLicense

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Quantification, description and international comparison of antimicrobial use on Irish pig farms

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    40813_2020_Article_166.pdf
    Size:
    1.480Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    O’Neill, Lorcan
    Rodrigues da Costa, Maria
    Leonard, Finola C
    Gibbons, James
    Calderón Díaz, Julia A
    McCutcheon, Gerard
    Manzanilla, Edgar G
    Keyword
    Antimicrobial use
    pig
    Ireland
    Date
    2020-10-12
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Statistics
    Display Item Statistics
    URI
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-020-00166-y; http://hdl.handle.net/11019/2733
    Citation
    O’Neill, L., Rodrigues da Costa, M., Leonard, F.C. et al. Quantification, description and international comparison of antimicrobial use on Irish pig farms. Porc Health Manag 6, 30 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-020-00166-y
    Abstract
    Abstract Background There is concern that the use of antimicrobials in livestock production has a role in the emergence and dissemination of antimicrobial resistance in animals and humans. Consequently, there are increasing efforts to reduce antimicrobial use (AMU) in agriculture. As the largest consumer of veterinary antimicrobials in several countries, the pig sector is a particular focus of these efforts. Data on AMU in pig production in Ireland are lacking. This study aimed to quantify AMU on Irish pig farms, to identify the major patterns of use employed and to compare the results obtained to those from other published reports and studies. Results Antimicrobial use data for 2016 was collected from 67 Irish pig farms which represented c. 35% of national production. The combined sample population consumed 14.5 t of antimicrobial by weight of active ingredient suggesting that the pig sector accounted for approximately 40% of veterinary AMU in Ireland in 2016. At farm level, median AMU measured in milligram per population correction unit (mg/PCU) was 93.9 (range: 1.0–1196.0). When measured in terms of treatment incidence (TI200), median AMU was 15.4 (range: 0.2–169.2). Oral treatments accounted for 97.5% of all AMU by weight of active ingredient and were primarily administered via medicated feed to pigs in the post weaning stages of production. AMU in Irish pig production in 2016 was higher than results obtained from the national reports of Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands and France but lower than the United Kingdom. Conclusions Pig production in Ireland is an important consumer of veterinary antimicrobials. The quantities and patterns of AMU on Irish pig farms are comparable to pig production in other European countries but higher than some countries with more advanced AMU reduction strategies. This AMU is characterised by a high proportion of prophylactic use and is primarily administered to pigs post weaning via medicated feed. Further studies to better understand the reasons for AMU on Irish pig farms and strategies to improve health among weaner pigs will be of benefit in the effort to reduce AMU.
    Funder
    Department of Agriculture Food and the Marine
    Grant Number
    15 S 676
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-020-00166-y
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Teagasc publications in Biomed Central

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.