Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBenoit, Marc
dc.contributor.authorSabatier, Rodolphe
dc.contributor.authorLasseur, Jacques
dc.contributor.authorCreighton, Philip
dc.contributor.authorDumont, Bertrand
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-29T15:27:28Z
dc.date.available2023-06-29T15:27:28Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-31
dc.identifier.citationBenoit, M., Sabatier, R., Lasseur, J. et al. Optimising economic and environmental performances of sheep-meat farms does not fully fit with the meat industry demands. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 39, 40 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-019-0588-9en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11019/2985
dc.descriptionpeer-revieweden_US
dc.description.abstractRuminant farming systems are questioned for their contribution to climate change and feed-food competition. Here, we analyse the economic and environmental performances of five sheep farming systems optimised in terms of ewe productivity and feeding costs. Systems are located in contrasting biogeographical areas along a gradient of decreasing agronomic potential from Ireland to the French Mediterranean rangelands. Applying a mechanistic model of flock and farm operation management to evaluate these five systems made it possible to highlight trade-offs between their economic performance under standardised economic conditions, environmental performances, and feed-food competition, but also discrepancies between sheep farm strategy and meat industry demands. Different management strategies resulted in ewe productivity ranging from 0.82 to 1.66 lambs ewe−1 year−1 between farming systems and concentrate use from 0 to 148 kg ewe−1 year −1 . The two systems relying the most on grassland and rangelands show the best economic and environmental performances while minimising feed-food competition. This results from a good match between animal feed requirements and forage availability; these systems, however, generate a high seasonality of production that does not meet the industry demand for a regular meat supply throughout the year. The Irish system also follows a forage autonomy strategy, but with poorer environmental and economic performance due to intensification, higher price of land, and lower meat price. Both the accelerated reproduction system with three lambing periods in two years and the organic system generate a more regular lamb supply, but require a higher level of concentrate feed, which negatively affects performances. These results highlight for the first time that optimising economic and environmental performances at farm level does not fully fit with the meat industry demand for a regular lamb meat supply throughout the year and lamb conformation. Low-productivity but fully self-sufficient fodder livestock systems can achieve excellent economic performance, but require both specific skills and marketing adequacy.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAgronomy for Sustainable Development;Vol 39
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://www.springer.com/tdm
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectRuminantsen_US
dc.subjectFarming systemen_US
dc.subjectFeed-food competitionen_US
dc.subjectModellingen_US
dc.subjectTrade-offsen_US
dc.subjectAgroecologyen_US
dc.subjectOrganic farmingen_US
dc.subjectPastoralismen_US
dc.titleOptimising economic and environmental performances of sheep-meat farms does not fully fit with the meat industry demandsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-019-0588-9
dc.source.volume39
dc.source.issue4
refterms.dateFOA2023-06-29T15:27:30Z
dc.source.journaltitleAgronomy for Sustainable Development


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
s13593-019-0588-9.pdf
Size:
650.6Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
main article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record