Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMetzler-Zebeli, Barbara U.
dc.contributor.authorSiegerstetter, Sina-Catherine
dc.contributor.authorMagowan, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorLawlor, Peadar G.
dc.contributor.authorPetri, Renée M.
dc.contributor.authorO´Connell, Niamh E.
dc.contributor.authorZebeli, Qendrim
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-19T14:36:58Z
dc.date.available2023-07-19T14:36:58Z
dc.date.issued2019-02-26
dc.identifier.citationMetzler-Zebeli BU, Siegerstetter SC, Magowan E, Lawlor PG, Petri RM, O Connell NE, Zebeli Q. Feed Restriction Modifies Intestinal Microbiota-Host Mucosal Networking in Chickens Divergent in Residual Feed Intake. mSystems. 2019 Jan 29;4(1):e00261-18. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00261-18. PMID: 30701192; PMCID: PMC6351724.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11019/3019
dc.descriptionpeer-revieweden_US
dc.description.abstractDifferences in chickens’ feed intake may be the underlying factor influencing feed-efficiency (FE)-associated variation in intestinal microbiota and physiology. In chickens eating the same amount of feed, quantitative feed restriction may create similar intestinal conditions and help clarify this cause-and-effect relationship. This study investigated the effect of ad libitum versus restrictive feeding (85% of ad libitum) on ileal and cecal microbiota, concentrations of short-chain fatty acids, visceral organ size, intestinal morphology, permeability, and expression of genes related to nutrient uptake, barrier function, and innate immune response in broiler chickens with divergent residual feed intake (RFI; metric for FE). On day 30 posthatch, 28 low-RFI (good FE) and 29 high-RFI (poor FE) chickens across both feedinglevel groups (n 112) were selected. Supervised multigroup data integration and relevance network analyses showed that especially Lactobacillus (negative) in ileal digesta, Turicibacter (positive) in cecal digesta, and Enterobacteriaceae (positive) in both intestinal segments depended on chicken’s feed intake, whereas the level of Anaerotruncus in cecal digesta was most discriminative for high RFI. Moreover, shallower crypts and fewer goblet cells in ceca indicated host-related energy-saving mechanisms with low RFI, whereas greater tissue resistance suggested a stronger jejunal barrier function in low-RFI chickens. Values corresponding to feed intake level RFI interactions indicated larger pancreas and lower levels of ileal and cecal short-chain fatty acids in restrictively fed high-RFI chickens than in the other 3 groups, suggesting host physiological adaptations to support greater energy and nutrient needs of high-RFI chickens compensating for the restricted feeding.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society for Microbiologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesmSystems;Vol 4
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectchickenen_US
dc.subjectfeed intake levelen_US
dc.subjectintestinal barrier functionen_US
dc.subjectintestinal microbiotaen_US
dc.subjectintestinal physiologyen_US
dc.subjectresidual feed intakeen_US
dc.subjectvisceral organsen_US
dc.titleFeed Restriction Modifies Intestinal Microbiota-Host Mucosal Networking in Chickens Divergent in Residual Feed Intakeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00261-18
dc.contributor.sponsorEuropean Unionen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumber311794en_US
dc.source.volume4
dc.source.issue1
refterms.dateFOA2023-07-19T14:36:59Z
dc.source.journaltitlemSystems


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
mSystems.00261-18.pdf
Size:
963.2Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
main article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International