Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShafiullah, Abu Zar
dc.contributor.authorWerner, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorKennedy, Emer
dc.contributor.authorLeso, Lorenzo
dc.contributor.authorO’Brien, Bernadette
dc.contributor.authorUmstätter, Christina
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-01T16:00:10Z
dc.date.available2023-08-01T16:00:10Z
dc.date.issued2019-10-16
dc.identifier.citationShafiullah, A.Z.; Werner, J.; Kennedy, E.; Leso, L.; O’Brien, B.; Umstätter, C. Machine Learning Based Prediction of Insufficient Herbage Allowance with Automated Feeding Behaviour and Activity Data. Sensors 2019, 19, 4479. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19204479en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11019/3040
dc.descriptionpeer-revieweden_US
dc.description.abstractSensor technologies that measure grazing and ruminating behaviour as well as physical activities of individual cows are intended to be included in precision pasture management. One of the advantages of sensor data is they can be analysed to support farmers in many decision-making processes. This article thus considers the performance of a set of RumiWatchSystem recorded variables in the prediction of insufficient herbage allowance for spring calving dairy cows. Several commonly used models in machine learning (ML) were applied to the binary classification problem, i.e., sufficient or insufficient herbage allowance, and the predictive performance was compared based on the classification evaluation metrics. Most of the ML models and generalised linear model (GLM) performed similarly in leave-out-one-animal (LOOA) approach to validation studies. However, cross validation (CV) studies, where a portion of features in the test and training data resulted from the same cows, revealed that support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) performed relatively better than other candidate models. In general, these ML models attained 88% AUC (area under receiver operating characteristic curve) and around 80% sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision and F-score. This study further identified that number of rumination chews per day and grazing bites per minute were the most important predictors and examined the marginal effects of the variables on model prediction towards a decision support system.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSensors;Vol 19
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectmachine learningen_US
dc.subjectbinary classificationen_US
dc.subjectherbage allowanceen_US
dc.subjectfeeding behaviour and activitiesen_US
dc.subjectprecision pasture managementen_US
dc.titleMachine Learning Based Prediction of Insufficient Herbage Allowance with Automated Feeding Behaviour and Activity Dataen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/s19204479
dc.contributor.sponsorScience Foundation Irelanden_US
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumber13/IA/1977en_US
dc.source.volume19
dc.source.issue20
dc.source.beginpage4479
refterms.dateFOA2023-08-01T16:00:11Z
dc.source.journaltitleSensors


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
sensors-19-04479.pdf
Size:
465.7Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
main article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International