Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorO’Neill, Lorcan
dc.contributor.authorCalderón Díaz, Julia Adriana
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues da Costa, Maria
dc.contributor.authorOakes, Sinnead
dc.contributor.authorLeonard, Finola C.
dc.contributor.authorGarcia Manzanilla, Edgar
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-01T16:13:40Z
dc.date.available2023-08-01T16:13:40Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-28
dc.identifier.citationO’Neill, L.; Calderón Díaz, J.A.; Rodrigues da Costa, M.; Oakes, S.; Leonard, F.C.; Manzanilla, E.G. Risk Factors for Antimicrobial Use on Irish Pig Farms. Animals 2021, 11, 2828. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102828en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11019/3044
dc.descriptionpeer-revieweden_US
dc.description.abstractThe threat to public health posed by antimicrobial resistance in livestock production means that the pig sector is a particular focus for efforts to reduce antimicrobial use (AMU). This study sought to investigate the risk factors for AMU in Irish pig production. Antimicrobial use data were collected from 52 farrow-to-finish farms. The risk factors investigated were farm characteristics and performance, biosecurity practices, prevalence of pluck lesions at slaughter and serological status for four common respiratory pathogens and vaccination and prophylactic AMU practices. Linear regression models were used for quantitative AMU analysis and risk factors for specific AMU practices were investigated using logistic regression. Farms that milled their own feed had lower total AMU (p < 0.001), whereas higher finisher mortality (p = 0.043) and vaccinating for swine influenza (p < 0.001) increased AMU. Farms with higher prevalence of pericarditis (p = 0.037) and lung abscesses (p = 0.046) used more group treatments. Farms with higher prevalence of liver milk spot lesions (p = 0.018) and farms practising prophylactic AMU in piglets (p = 0.03) had higher numbers of individual treatments. Farms practising prophylactic AMU in piglets (p = 0.002) or sows (p = 0.062) had higher use of cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. This study identified prophylactic use and respiratory disease as the main drivers for AMU in Irish pig production. These findings highlight areas of farm management where interventions may aid in reducing AMU on Irish pig farms.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Ireland
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnimals;Vol 11
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectantimicrobial useen_US
dc.subjectbiosecurityen_US
dc.subjectIrelanden_US
dc.subjectpigsen_US
dc.subjectrespiratory diseaseen_US
dc.subjectrisk factorsen_US
dc.titleRisk Factors for Antimicrobial Use on Irish Pig Farmsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.embargo.terms2021-09-28en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102828
dc.contributor.sponsorIrish Department of Agriculture Food and the Marineen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumber15 S 676en_US
dc.source.volume11
dc.source.issue10
dc.source.beginpage2828
refterms.dateFOA2022-09-28T00:00:00Z
dc.source.journaltitleAnimals


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
animals-11-02828-v2.pdf
Size:
725.6Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
main article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International