Testing barrier materials in the development of a biosecurity pen to protect broilers against Campylobacter
Name:
Testing-barrier-materials-in-t ...
Size:
1.172Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
main article
Author
Greene, GenevieveKoolman, Leonard
Whyte, Paul
Lynch, Helen
Coffey, Aidan
Lucey, Brigid
O'Connor, Lisa
Bolton, Declan
Date
2021-10-31
Metadata
Show full item recordStatistics
Display Item StatisticsCitation
Genevieve Greene, Leonard Koolman, Paul Whyte, Helen Lynch, Aidan Coffey, Brigid Lucey, Lisa O'Connor, Declan Bolton, Testing barrier materials in the development of a biosecurity pen to protect broilers against Campylobacter, Food Control, Volume 128, 2021, 108172, ISSN 0956-7135, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108172.Abstract
Previous studies demonstrated that commercial broiler flocks could be protected from Campylobacter colonisation using a bird pen, termed the “biosecurity cube”, constructed from four polycarbonate sheets (1m high x 2.5m long x 6 mm thick) supported at the corners by 4 × 1m high wooden columns. However, this design had issues with airflow and potential for upscaling. A biosecurity cube composed of four galvanised steel mesh panels (3.44m long x 1.25m high) was therefore developed onto which different barrier materials, preventing contact between the test birds and the main flock, were attached. The objective of this study was to test a range of barrier materials including cardboard, wire mesh, polyurethane film and later (at the suggestion of broiler industry personnel) flyscreen mesh. Initial studies suggested that while the cardboard and wire mesh were ineffective, the polyurethane film protected the birds. Further validation (over 2 separate trials, 7 cubes for each barrier material) demonstrated that polyurethane and flyscreen mesh were effective. It was concluded that a biosecurity pen infrastructure based on galvanised steel mesh panels surrounded by polyurethane film or flyscreen mesh was effective at protecting the birds from Campylobacter but upscaling studies will be undertaken before full implementation.Funder
Department of Agriculture Food and Marine; Teagasc Walsh ScholarshipGrant Number
Project 15/F/641; WS number 2017262ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108172
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.