Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGreene, Genevieve
dc.contributor.authorKoolman, Leonard
dc.contributor.authorWhyte, Paul
dc.contributor.authorLynch, Helen
dc.contributor.authorCoffey, Aidan
dc.contributor.authorLucey, Brigid
dc.contributor.authorO'Connor, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorBolton, Declan
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-15T13:43:06Z
dc.date.available2023-08-15T13:43:06Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-31
dc.identifier.citationGenevieve Greene, Leonard Koolman, Paul Whyte, Helen Lynch, Aidan Coffey, Brigid Lucey, Lisa O'Connor, Declan Bolton, Testing barrier materials in the development of a biosecurity pen to protect broilers against Campylobacter, Food Control, Volume 128, 2021, 108172, ISSN 0956-7135, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108172.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11019/3122
dc.descriptionpeer-revieweden_US
dc.description.abstractPrevious studies demonstrated that commercial broiler flocks could be protected from Campylobacter colonisation using a bird pen, termed the “biosecurity cube”, constructed from four polycarbonate sheets (1m high x 2.5m long x 6 mm thick) supported at the corners by 4 × 1m high wooden columns. However, this design had issues with airflow and potential for upscaling. A biosecurity cube composed of four galvanised steel mesh panels (3.44m long x 1.25m high) was therefore developed onto which different barrier materials, preventing contact between the test birds and the main flock, were attached. The objective of this study was to test a range of barrier materials including cardboard, wire mesh, polyurethane film and later (at the suggestion of broiler industry personnel) flyscreen mesh. Initial studies suggested that while the cardboard and wire mesh were ineffective, the polyurethane film protected the birds. Further validation (over 2 separate trials, 7 cubes for each barrier material) demonstrated that polyurethane and flyscreen mesh were effective. It was concluded that a biosecurity pen infrastructure based on galvanised steel mesh panels surrounded by polyurethane film or flyscreen mesh was effective at protecting the birds from Campylobacter but upscaling studies will be undertaken before full implementation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFood Control;Vol 128
dc.rights© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectBiosecurityen_US
dc.subjectCampylobacteren_US
dc.subjectBroileren_US
dc.subjectPoultryen_US
dc.subjectBarrieren_US
dc.titleTesting barrier materials in the development of a biosecurity pen to protect broilers against Campylobacteren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.embargo.terms2022-10-31en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108172
dc.contributor.sponsorDepartment of Agriculture Food and Marineen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorTeagasc Walsh Scholarshipen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumberProject 15/F/641en_US
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumberWS number 2017262en_US
dc.source.volume128
dc.source.beginpage108172
refterms.dateFOA2022-10-31T00:00:00Z
dc.source.journaltitleFood Control


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Testing-barrier-materials-in-t ...
Size:
1.172Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
main article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.