Brainy, Crazy, Supernatural, Clumsy and Normal: Five profiles of children's stereotypical and non-stereotypical perceptions of scientists in the Draw-A-Scientist-Test
Name:
Brainy--Crazy--Supernatural--C ...
Size:
4.867Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
main article
Citation
Tereza J. Brumovska, Sarah Carroll, Martin Javornicky, Muriel Grenon, Brainy, Crazy, Supernatural, Clumsy and Normal: Five profiles of children's stereotypical and non-stereotypical perceptions of scientists in the Draw-A-Scientist-Test, International Journal of Educational Research Open, Volume 3, 2022, 100180, ISSN 2666-3740, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100180.Abstract
Children's perceptions of scientists have traditionally been explored using the Draw-a-Scientist Test (DAST). However, the DAST method, whereby researchers analyse large numbers of children's drawings according to a checklist, is often criticised for not taking children's voices into account. In this study, to explore children's perceptions of scientists, children in four primary schools (N = 105) were asked to 'Draw a Scientist', then describe their drawings in an open-ended qualitative questionnaire. A subsample of 30 participants also participated in semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis that was conducted on the collected data derived five different profiles of scientists described by children: 1) Brainy Scientist, 2) Crazy Scientist, 3) Supernatural Scientist, 4) Clumsy Scientist, and 5) Normal Scientist. These distinct profiles shift from the typical ‘stereotypical’ versus ‘non-stereotypical stance’ often presented, describing novel nuances within stereotypical profiles. This work highlights the importance of employing qualitative participatory research methods and incorporating children's voices. The article concludes with suggestions for several directions for future research.Funder
Science Foundation IrelandGrant Number
18DP5772ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100180
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.