Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarrett, Brian
dc.contributor.authorRaab, Christoph
dc.contributor.authorCawkwell, Fiona
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Stuart
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-09T11:55:42Z
dc.date.available2023-10-09T11:55:42Z
dc.date.issued2016-11-28
dc.identifier.citationBarrett, B., Raab, C., Cawkwell, F., & Green, S. (2016). Upland vegetation mapping using Random Forests with optical and radar satellite data. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 2(4), 212–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.32en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11019/3303
dc.descriptionpeer-revieweden_US
dc.description.abstractUplands represent unique landscapes that provide a range of vital benefits to society, but are under increasing pressure from the management needs of a diverse number of stakeholders (e.g. farmers, conservationists, foresters, government agencies and recreational users). Mapping the spatial distribution of upland vegetation could benefit management and conservation programmes and allow for the impacts of environmental change (natural and anthropogenic) in these areas to be reliably estimated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of medium spatial resolution optical and radar satellite data, together with ancillary soil and topographic data, for identifying and mapping upland vegetation using the Random Forests (RF) algorithm. Intensive field survey data collected at three study sites in Ireland as part of the National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) funded survey of upland habitats was used in the calibration and validation of different RF models. Eight different datasets were analysed for each site to compare the change in classification accuracy depending on the input variables. The overall accuracy values varied from 59.8% to 94.3% across the three study locations and the inclusion of ancillary datasets containing information on the soil and elevation further improved the classification accuracies (between 5 and 27%, depending on the input classification dataset). The classification results were consistent across the three different study areas, confirming the applicability of the approach under different environmental contexts.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEnvironmental Protection Agency
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRemote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation;Vol 2
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectRadaren_US
dc.subjectRandom forestsen_US
dc.subjectremote sensingen_US
dc.subjectsatellite dataen_US
dc.subjectuplandsen_US
dc.subjectvegetation mappingen_US
dc.titleUpland vegetation mapping using Random Forests with optical and radar satellite dataen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.32
dc.contributor.sponsorEnvironmental Protection Agencyen_US
dc.source.volume2
dc.source.issue4
dc.source.beginpage212
dc.source.endpage231
refterms.dateFOA2023-10-09T11:55:43Z
dc.source.journaltitleRemote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Remote Sens Ecol Conserv - 2016 ...
Size:
2.342Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
main article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International