Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDuffy, Colm
dc.contributor.authorO'Donoghue, Cathal
dc.contributor.authorRyan, Mary
dc.contributor.authorStyles, David
dc.contributor.authorSpillane, Charles
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-19T15:30:15Z
dc.date.available2023-12-19T15:30:15Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-15
dc.identifier.citationColm Duffy, Cathal O'Donoghue, Mary Ryan, David Styles, Charles Spillane, Afforestation: Replacing livestock emissions with carbon sequestration, Journal of Environmental Management, Volume 264, 2020, 110523, ISSN 0301-4797, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110523.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11019/3415
dc.descriptionpeer-revieweden_US
dc.description.abstractIn Ireland, agriculture accounts for 33% of national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Ireland faces significant challenges in terms of emissions reduction and is well off course in terms of meeting binding European Union targets. Flexibility mechanisms will allow Ireland to offset 5.6% of its commitment via sequestration in biomass and soils and land use change. Agricultural emissions in Ireland are largely driven by livestock production. As such, the purpose of this research is to estimate the net GHG emission benefit resulting from a land use change with forest replacing livestock systems (dairy, beef cattle and sheep). We estimate the total carbon sequestration in biomass and harvested wood products, along with the total emissions avoided from each livestock system on a per hectare basis. In addition, the paper compares the social cost of carbon to the average income per hectare of each livestock system. Finally, a hypothetical national planting scenario is modelled using plausible planting rates. Results indicate that the greatest carbon benefit is achieved when forest replaces dairy production. This is due to high emissions per hectare from dairy systems, and greater sequestration potential in higher-yielding forests planted on better quality soils associated with dairy production. The inclusion of harvested wood products in subsequent rotations has the potential to enhance GHG mitigation and offset terrestrial carbon loss. A hypothetical national planting scenario, afforesting 100,000 ha substituting dairy, beef cattle and sheep livestock systems could abate 13.91 Mt CO2e after 10 years, and 150.14 Mt CO2e (unthinned plantations) or 125.89 Mt CO2e (thinned plantations) over the course of the rotation. These results highlight the critical role for forest land use change in meeting the urgent need to tackle rising agricultural emissions.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Environmental Management;Vol 264
dc.rights© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectAfforestationen_US
dc.subjectForest policyen_US
dc.subjectLand use changeen_US
dc.subjectCarbon sequestrationen_US
dc.subjectLivestocken_US
dc.subjectGHG Mitigationen_US
dc.titleAfforestation: Replacing livestock emissions with carbon sequestrationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110523
dc.contributor.sponsorIrish Research Council Postgraduate Scholarship schemeen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumberGOIPG/2015/3416en_US
dc.source.volume264
dc.source.beginpage110523
refterms.dateFOA2023-12-19T15:30:16Z
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of Environmental Management


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
1-s2.0-S0301479720304576-main.pdf
Size:
2.020Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
main article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.