Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLahart, B.
dc.contributor.authorPrendiville, R.
dc.contributor.authorBuckley, F.
dc.contributor.authorKennedy, E.
dc.contributor.authorConroy, S.B.
dc.contributor.authorBoland, T.M.
dc.contributor.authorMcGee, M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-02T15:34:44Z
dc.date.available2024-01-02T15:34:44Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-31
dc.identifier.citationB. Lahart, R. Prendiville, F. Buckley, E. Kennedy, S.B. Conroy, T.M. Boland, M. McGee, The repeatability of feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle offered high-concentrate, grass silage and pasture-based diets, Animal, Volume 14, Issue 11, 2020, Pages 2288-2297, ISSN 1751-7311, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731120000853.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11019/3464
dc.descriptionpeer-revieweden_US
dc.description.abstractBreeding values for feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle are generally derived indoors on high-concentrate (HC) diets. Within temperate regions of north-western Europe, however, the majority of a growing beef animal’s lifetime dietary intake comes from grazed grass and grass silage. Using 97 growing beef cattle, the objective of the current study was to assess the repeatability of both feed intake and feed efficiency across 3 successive dietary test periods comprising grass silage plus concentrates (S+C), grazed grass (GRZ) and a HC diet. Individual DM intake (DMI), DMI/kg BW and feed efficiency-related parameters, residual feed intake (RFI) and gain to feed ratio (G : F) were assessed. There was a significant correlation for DMI between the S+C and GRZ periods (r = 0.32; P < 0.01) as well as between the S+C and HC periods (r = 0.41; P < 0.001), whereas there was no association for DMI between the GRZ and HC periods. There was a significant correlation for DMI/kg BW between the S+C and GRZ periods (r = 0.33; P < 0.01) and between the S+C and HC periods (r = 0.40; P < 0.001), but there was no association for the trait between the GRZ and HC periods. There was a significant correlation for RFI between the S+C and GRZ periods (r = 0.25; P < 0.05) as well as between S+C and HC periods (r = 0.25; P < 0.05), whereas there was no association for RFI between the GRZ and HC periods. Gain to feed ratio was not correlated between any of the test periods. A secondary aspect of the study demonstrated that traits recorded in the GRZ period relating to grazing bite rate, the number of daily grazing bouts and ruminating bouts were associated with DMI (r = 0.28 to 0.42; P < 0.05 - 0.001), DMI/kg BW (r = 0.36 to 0.45; P < 0.01 - 0.001) and RFI (r = 0.31 to 0.42; P < 0.05 - 0.001). Additionally, the number of ruminating boli produced per day and per ruminating bout were associated with G : F (r = 0.28 and 0.26, respectively; P < 0.05). Results from this study demonstrate that evaluating animals for both feed intake and feed efficiency indoors on HC diets may not reflect their phenotypic performance when consuming conserved forage-based diets indoors or when grazing pasture.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnimal;Vol 14
dc.rightsCopyright © 2020 The Animal Consortium. Published by Elsevier B.V.
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectbeef cattleen_US
dc.subjectfeed efficiencyen_US
dc.subjectre-rankingen_US
dc.subjectingestive behaviouren_US
dc.subjectherbage intakeen_US
dc.titleThe repeatability of feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle offered high-concentrate, grass silage and pasture-based dietsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731120000853
dc.contributor.sponsorDepartment of Agriculture Food and the Marineen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumber13/S/496 RAPIDFEEDen_US
dc.source.volume14
dc.source.issue11
dc.source.beginpage2288
dc.source.endpage2297
refterms.dateFOA2024-01-02T15:34:45Z
dc.source.journaltitleAnimal


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
1-s2.0-S1751731120000853-main.pdf
Size:
152.4Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
main article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © 2020 The Animal Consortium. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2020 The Animal Consortium. Published by Elsevier B.V.