Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEdwin, Niranjana R.
dc.contributor.authorFitzpatrick, Amy H.
dc.contributor.authorBrennan, Fiona
dc.contributor.authorAbram, Florence
dc.contributor.authorO’Sullivan, Orla
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-07T14:46:16Z
dc.date.available2024-06-07T14:46:16Z
dc.date.issued2024-03-28
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Microbiome. 2024 Mar 28;19(1):19
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-024-00561-w
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11019/3697
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Recent endeavours in metagenomics, exemplified by projects such as the human microbiome project and TARA Oceans, have illuminated the complexities of microbial biomes. A robust bioinformatic pipeline and meticulous evaluation of their methodology have contributed to the success of these projects. The soil environment, however, with its unique challenges, requires a specialized methodological exploration to maximize microbial insights. A notable limitation in soil microbiome studies is the dearth of soil-specific reference databases available to classifiers that emulate the complexity of soil communities. There is also a lack of in-vitro mock communities derived from soil strains that can be assessed for taxonomic classification accuracy. Results In this study, we generated a custom in-silico mock community containing microbial genomes commonly observed in the soil microbiome. Using this mock community, we simulated shotgun sequencing data to evaluate the performance of three leading metagenomic classifiers: Kraken2 (supplemented with Bracken, using a custom database derived from GTDB-TK genomes along with its own default database), Kaiju, and MetaPhlAn, utilizing their respective default databases for a robust analysis. Our results highlight the importance of optimizing taxonomic classification parameters, database selection, as well as analysing trimmed reads and contigs. Our study showed that classifiers tailored to the specific taxa present in our samples led to fewer errors compared to broader databases including microbial eukaryotes, protozoa, or human genomes, highlighting the effectiveness of targeted taxonomic classification. Notably, an optimal classifier performance was achieved when applying a relative abundance threshold of 0.001% or 0.005%. The Kraken2 supplemented with bracken, with a custom database demonstrated superior precision, sensitivity, F1 score, and overall sequence classification. Using a custom database, this classifier classified 99% of in-silico reads and 58% of real-world soil shotgun reads, with the latter identifying previously overlooked phyla using a custom database. Conclusion This study underscores the potential advantages of in-silico methodological optimization in metagenomic analyses, especially when deciphering the complexities of soil microbiomes. We demonstrate that the choice of classifier and database significantly impacts microbial taxonomic profiling. Our findings suggest that employing Kraken2 with Bracken, coupled with a custom database of GTDB-TK genomes and fungal genomes at a relative abundance threshold of 0.001% provides optimal accuracy in soil shotgun metagenome analysis.
dc.titleAn in-depth evaluation of metagenomic classifiers for soil microbiomes
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.date.updated2024-03-31T03:15:20Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
refterms.dateFOA2024-06-07T14:46:17Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
40793_2024_Article_561.pdf
Size:
5.539Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record