Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrennan, Raymond B.*
dc.contributor.authorHealy, Mark G.*
dc.contributor.authorFenton, Owen*
dc.contributor.authorLanigan, Gary*
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-14T11:59:08Z
dc.date.available2015-08-14T11:59:08Z
dc.date.issued08/06/2015
dc.identifier.citationBrennan RB, Healy MG, Fenton O, Lanigan GJ (2015) The Effect of Chemical Amendments Used for Phosphorus Abatement on Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Emissions from Dairy Cattle Slurry: Synergies and Pollution Swapping. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0111965. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111965en_GB
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11019/818
dc.descriptionpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.description.abstractLand application of cattle slurry can result in incidental and chronic phosphorus (P) loss to waterbodies, leading to eutrophication. Chemical amendment of slurry has been proposed as a management practice, allowing slurry nutrients to remain available to plants whilst mitigating P losses in runoff. The effectiveness of amendments is well understood but their impacts on other loss pathways (so-called ‘pollution swapping’ potential) and therefore the feasibility of using such amendments has not been examined to date. The aim of this laboratory scale study was to determine how the chemical amendment of slurry affects losses of NH3, CH4, N2O, and CO2. Alum, FeCl2, Polyaluminium chloride (PAC)- and biochar reduced NH3 emissions by 92, 54, 65 and 77% compared to the slurry control, while lime increased emissions by 114%. Cumulative N2O emissions of cattle slurry increased when amended with alum and FeCl2 by 202% and 154% compared to the slurry only treatment. Lime, PAC and biochar resulted in a reduction of 44, 29 and 63% in cumulative N2O loss compared to the slurry only treatment. Addition of amendments to slurry did not significantly affect soil CO2 release during the study while CH4 emissions followed a similar trend for all of the amended slurries applied, with an initial increase in losses followed by a rapid decrease for the duration of the study. All of the amendments examined reduced the initial peak in CH4 emissions compared to the slurry only treatment. There was no significant effect of slurry amendments on global warming potential (GWP) caused by slurry land application, with the exception of biochar. After considering pollution swapping in conjunction with amendment effectiveness, the amendments recommended for further field study are PAC, alum and lime. This study has also shown that biochar has potential to reduce GHG losses arising from slurry application.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by the Teagasc Walsh Fellowship Scheme and the AnimalChange Framework 7 Project (FP7-KBBE-2010-4).
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherPLoSen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPLoS ONE;vol 10(6)
dc.subjectEnvironmenten_GB
dc.subjectPollution swappingen_GB
dc.subjectSlurriesen_GB
dc.subjectGreenhouse Gasen_GB
dc.titleThe Effect of Chemical Amendments Used for Phosphorus Abatement on Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Emissions from Dairy Cattle Slurry: Synergies and Pollution Swappingen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.rmisJCEV-0322-6115
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111965
dc.contributor.sponsorEuropean Union
dc.contributor.sponsorTeagasc Walsh Fellowship Programme
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumberFP7-KBBE-2010-4
refterms.dateFOA2018-01-12T08:06:11Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
PLosOne Brennan.pdf
Size:
1.102Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record