Hutchings, Nicholas J.Petersen, Søren O.Richards, Karl G.Pacholski, Andreas S.Fuß, RolandAbalos, DiegoForrestal, Patrick J.Pelster, DavidEckard, Richard J.Alfaro, MartaSmith, Kate E.Thorman, RachelButterbach‐Bahl, KlausChirinda, NgonidzasheBittman, Shabtaide Klein, Cecile A. M.Hyde, BernardAmon, Barbaravan der Weerden, Tonydel Prado, AgustinKrol, Dominika J.2025-01-282025-01-282024-12-06Hutchings, NJ, Petersen, SO, Richards, KG, Pacholski, AS, Fuß, R, Abalos, D, Forrestal, PJ, Pelster, D, Eckard, RJ, Alfaro, M, Smith, KE, Thorman, R, Butterbach-Bahl, K, Chirinda, N, Bittman, S, de Klein, CAM, Hyde, B, Amon, B, van der Weerden, T, del Prado, A & Krol, DJ 2024, 'Preconditions for Including the Effects of Urease and Nitrification Inhibitors in Emission Inventories', Global change biology, vol. 30, no. 12, e17618. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.176181354-1013http://hdl.handle.net/11019/3753Peer-reviewedUrease and nitrification inhibitors can reduce ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from fertilizers and manure but their effectiveness depends on the conditions under which they are used. Consequently, it is essential for the credibility of emission reductions reported in regulatory emission inventories that their effectiveness is assessed under real-world conditions and not just in the laboratory. Here, we specify the criteria we consider necessary before the effects of inhibitors are included in regulatory emission inventories.enAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vorhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/AmmoniaUreaseGreenhouse gasesNitrificationArticle10.1111/gcb.1761810.1111/gcb.176181365-2486