Optimising The Response To Supplementary Concentrates By Beef Cattle In Winter

dc.contributor.authorKeane, Michael G.*
dc.contributor.authorDrennan, Michael J*
dc.contributor.authorMoloney, Aidan P*
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-30T16:24:25Z
dc.date.available2015-10-30T16:24:25Z
dc.date.issued2008-01-01
dc.descriptionEnd of project reporten_GB
dc.description.abstractConcentrates are a major component of feed costs in winter finishing of beef cattle. Two separate experiments were carried out to evaluate the response to increasing supplementary concentrate level with grass silage and the effects of feeding the silage and concentrates separately or as a total mixed ration (TMR). In experiment 1, a total of 117 finishing steers (initial live weight 538 kg, s.d. 35.5) were assigned to a preexperimental slaughter group of 9 animals and to 6 feeding treatments of 18 animals each. The feeding treatments were: 1) silage (SO) only offered ad libitum, 2) SO plus a low level of concentrates offered separately (LS), 3) SO plus a low level of concentrates offered as a TMR (LM), 4) SO plus a medium level of concentrates offered separately (MS), 5) SO plus a medium level of concentrates offered as a TMR (MM), and 6) concentrates ad libitum plus a restricted silage allowance (AL). Low and medium target concentrate levels were 3 and 6 kg dry matter (DM) per head daily. When silage and concentrates were fed separately, the daily concentrate allowance was given in one morning feed. The animals were individually fed for a mean period of 132 days. After slaughter, carcasses were weighed and graded and the ribs joint was dissected into its component tissues. Silage DM intake decreased but total DM intake increased with increasing concentrate level. Live weight gains for SO, LS, LM, MS, MM and AL were 0.34, 0.86, 0.86, 1.02, 1.00 and 1.12 (s.e. 0.064) kg/day, respectively. Corresponding carcass weight gains were 0.25, 0.58, 0.58, 0.71, 0.68 and 0.82 (s.e. 0.028) kg/day. All measures of fatness increased, ribs joint bone proportion decreased, and muscle proportion was not significantly affected by dietary concentrate level. There were no significant interactions between concentrate level and method of feeding. Compared with offering the feeds separately, feeding a TMR increased silage DM intake by proportionately 0.06 and total DM intake by proportionately 0.04. Otherwise, method of feeding had no significant effect on performance, slaughter or carcass traits. Mean rumen pH decreased while ammonia concentration tended to increase with increasing concentrate level. Total volatile fatty acids and the acetate to propionate ratio were lowest for SO. Method of feeding had no significant effect on rumen fermentation.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationKeane, M.G., Drennan, M.J., Moloney, A.P., Optimising The Response To Supplementary Concentrates By Beef Cattle In Winter, Beef Production Series No. 73, Teagasc, 2008.en_GB
dc.identifier.isbn1841704962
dc.identifier.rmis5075
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11019/900
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherTeagascen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBeef Production Series;73
dc.subjectCattleen_GB
dc.subjectBeefen_GB
dc.subjectsupplementsen_GB
dc.subjectmeaten_GB
dc.titleOptimising The Response To Supplementary Concentrates By Beef Cattle In Winteren_GB
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_GB
dspace.entity.typePublication
refterms.dateFOA2018-01-12T08:22:43Z
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
eopr-5075.pdf
Size:
110.17 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.41 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: